If you are a member of the Wesleyan-Anglican Society, or if you would like to become a member, the following video contains information that you will be interested in!
Wesleyan/Anglican
Thoughts from a pastor who understands himself to be classically Wesleyan in theology and who embraces a Wesleyan/Anglican view of liturgy and the sacraments.
Saturday, May 24, 2025
Wesleyan-Anglican Society News
Aldersgate Day 2025
Happy Aldersgate Day!
I invite you to take a look at my video for Aldersgate Day, this year, and following the video, I invite you to join me in the prayer, listed below.
(Prayer by Fred D. Gealy)
Saturday, November 23, 2024
Christ the King Sunday
In honor of Christ the King Sunday, find, below, a copy of Charles Wesley's great hymn, “Rejoice, the Lord Is King.” - The hymn will be printed as it appears in the Sing to the Lord (Nazarene) hymnal and most other hymnals. At Main Street UMC, we will be singing the version that appears in The United Methodist Hymnal, which includes some rather strange editorial changes in verses 1, 3, and 4; changes that seem not to make sense. The predecessor hymnal, The Methodist Hymnal, retains the hymn as appears elsewhere. - Interestingly, the brand new O For a Heart to Praise My God: Hymns of Charles Wesley and Scriptural Liturgies follows the UMC hymnal when it comes to the changes in verses 3 and 4.
It is also interesting (and puzzling) that this hymn does not seem to appear in volume 7 of The Works of John Wesley: A Collection of Hymns for the Use of The People Called Methodists. If it had, perhaps light may have been shed as to why the UMC hymnal changed the text.
Lift up your heart;
Lift up your voice! Rejoice; again I say: rejoice!
Lift up your heart;
Lift up your voice! Rejoice; again I say: rejoice!
Lift up your heart;
Lift up your voice! Rejoice; again I say: rejoice!
Lift up your heart;
Lift up your voice! Rejoice; again I say: rejoice!
Sunday, November 3, 2024
Baptismal Regeneration or Evangelical New Birth?
The following passage is taken From the introductory comment of "17. The Marks of the New Birth" in "The Sermons of John Wesley: A Collection for the Christian Journey," edited by Kenneth J. Collins and Jason E. Vickers. In this passage, it is affirmed that Wesley clearly taught baptismal regeneration for those infants who are faithfully baptized. However, he also deals with those who have "sinned away the grace given to them in their baptism." It is the balance of a sacramental theology of baptismal regeneration and an evangelical theology of the new birth. - One does not preclude the other!
"Though Wesley clearly taught that 'our Church supposes all who are baptized in their infancy are at the same time born again ' (S, 1:281), his emphasis in this sermon is elsewhere - not on what they once were, but on what they now are. 'How many are the baptized gluttons and drunkards, the baptized liars and common swearers, the baptized railers and evil-speakers, the baptized whoremongers, thieves, extortioners!' he asked. And even more pointedly Wesley concluded: if 'there is no new birth but in baptism [then this], is to seal you all under damnation, to consign you to hell, without any help, without hope' (O, 1:429)."
Friday, November 1, 2024
All Saints' Day
Today, November 1, is All Saints' Day! Many Protestant churches transfer All Saints' Day to the following Sunday and observe All Saints' on Sunday. We will be doing that in our congregation, as well. However, I wanted to make sure that I published a post, today.
As The United Methodist Book of Worship reminds us, "All Saints (November 1 or the first Sunday in November) is a day of remembrance for the saints, with the New Testament meaning of all Christian people of every time and place. We celebrate the communion of saints as we remember the dead, both of the Church universal and of our local congregations. For this reason, the names of persons in the congregation who have died during the past year may be solemnly read as a Response to the Word."Since, All Saints' is not only a recognition of death, but also a celebration of life through the Resurrection, all of the paraments, banners & stoles are white, which is the joyful and festive color used at Christmas and Easter.
All Saints' was a favorite of John Wesley's. He mentioned it four times in his journal. On All Saints' in 1748, Wesley said, "Being All-Saints' day, we had a solemn assembly at the chapel; as I cannot but observe, we have had on this very day, for several years. Surely, 'right dear in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints!'" In 1756 Wesley says, "November 1, was a day of triumphant joy, as All-Saints' Day generally is. How superstitious are they who scruple giving God solemn thanks for the lives and deaths of his saints!" In 1767, he included in his journal the following comments: "Being All-Saints' Day, (a festival I dearly love,) I could not but observe the admirable propriety with which the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel for the day are suited to each other."
The Collect for the day from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer (which would be the Prayer Book Wesley used) reads as follows (and I would encourage all to pray):
Thursday, October 31, 2024
John Wesley and the Reformation
***This is a re-post from last year for Reformation Day.***
And so, on All Hallows' Eve (i.e., the eve of All Saints' Day; what we call "Halloween"), in 1517, Martin Luther nailed his "95 Thesis" on the door of the Wittenberg church. It was an act seeking an academic debate over certain issues in the Church, not a declaration of a split with Rome. Nevertheless, this act became the beginning of the Protestant Reformation.
That was in 1517, but where does the Wesleyan tradition fit? How are we connected to Luther and the Protestant Reformation?
Well, there is one direct connection between Wesley and Luther, and it happened on Aldersgate Street, in London, in 1738. There, while attending a Society meeting, someone was reading aloud from Luther's Preface to the Epistle to the Romans. It was while hearing this read that John Wesley felt his "heart strangely warmed," and an assurance was given him that God had taken away his sins and had saved him from the law of sin and death. This has been called Wesley's "evangelical conversion." It is the touchstone for the Wesleyan doctrine of assurance. - Certainly, in that regard, we Wesleyans owe quite a debt to Martin Luther. - But, how do we relate to Luther's Protestant Reformation?
To answer that question, I have included the following video from Seedbed, by Dr. Larry Wood. In it, he explains the place of John Wesley in the Protestant Reformation.
Still, in the midst of observing Reformation day, I think it important to hear another perspective. A perspective that is articulated in one of my favorite quotes from the late Rev'd. Dr. William Greathouse, general superintendent emeritus in the Church of the Nazarene. He says:
"It is time the Church of Jesus Christ overcame the disjunctions created by the 16th-century Reformation. What is called for is the 'evangelical catholicism' of John Wesley's 'middle way' in which the two historic Christian traditions were synthesized. In this synthesis the English Reformer not only recovered for the Church a viable doctrine of holiness but also pointed the way to a scriptural view and practice of the sacraments that is both apostolic and catholic."
It must be admitted that the Reformation did result in many disjunctions. Some of them are painfully present, to this day. Even among the children of Wesley, when one seeks to recover his commitment to liturgical and sacramental worship, one is often said to be "too Catholic" (i,e., bad!), rather than recognizing that the desire is simply to be thoroughly Wesleyan and thoroughly Christian. - Beyond that, in addition to doctrinal differences, there is still much prejudice between Protestant Christians and Roman Catholic Christians.
Perhaps, as we observe Reformation Day, it would be a good time for those of us who are Wesleyans to re-read Wesley's Letter to a Roman Catholic. Perhaps it is also time for us to recognize that, while there are certainly still very significant doctrinal disagreements between Protestants and Roman Catholics, nevertheless, the Protestant Reformation did influence changes that came about in the Roman Catholic Counter Reformation.
Beyond that, it is worth celebrating that the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church developed The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by representatives of both traditions on October 31, 1999 (the anniversary of Luther's 95 Theses!). The World Methodist Council was represented at that historic event and brought a letter of congratulations. On July 23, 2006, another document was signed by the Lutherans, Roman Catholics and Methodists, adding the Official Common Affirmation of the Methodist Statement of Association with the JDDJ to the original document. That statement was approved unanimously by the World Methodist Council members, including those representing all seven U.S. based denominations.
Are Nazarenes Protestant? The Wesleyan Position of Catholic and Reformed
***The following is a re-post for Reformation Day from 2017***
Below, I will post his comment in its entirety. I will follow that up by a few additional comments. (I would note, here, that I love that he ends his comments by using one of my favorite quotes from the late +Rev'd. Dr. William Greathouse.) - Here is Tom's post:
***
Protestant?
Is the Church of the Nazarene a Protestant denomination? Well, for starters, there is little doubt that the vast majority of pastors and laypersons in our churches would readily affirm that we are indeed Protestants. To the extent that self-identification counts for something, it would seem that we are Protestants.
I would suggest that the answer depends upon one's definition of "Protestant." There is a fairly popular and widespread understanding that "Protestants" are those branches of western Christianity that broke ties with the Roman Catholic Church during the sixteenth century. If one's definition of "Protestant" is "any western Christian church that is not Roman Catholic," then churches in the Wesleyan theological tradition are certainly "Protestant" denominations.
But I would argue that we ought to consider a more carefully nuanced definition of "Protestant." For one thing, the sixteenth-century Protestants split with the Roman Catholic Church because they were "protesting" something. Martin Luther, John Calvin, and the other leading Protestant reformers were protesting what they understood to be theological errors regarding salvation and Christian epistemology within the Roman Catholic Church. The Church of England, on the other hand, broke with Rome because Henry VIII was upset over the pope's refusal to grant him an annulment--hardly the same kind of "protest" that the Protestant reformers were making.
Unlike the continental Protestant traditions, which embarked on a thorough theological revisioning from the outset, articulating careful theological delineations between themselves and the Roman Catholic Church, the Church of England vacillated between Roman Catholic and Protestant sympathies for a few years before eventually settling on a middle course that rejected "extreme" positions of both the Protestants and the Roman Catholics in favor of a via media that is often summarized as "neither Roman Catholic nor Protestant, but both catholic and reformed."
Historically, our heritage lies in the Wesleyan Evangelical Revival that took place in England during the eighteenth century. Both John and Charles Wesley insisted that the Methodist movement was a revival within the Church of England and was to remain in the Church of England. They urged the Methodists to continue to attend worship at their local Church of England parish, where they would also be able to receive the Lord's Supper; in fact, the Wesleys were careful to use "lay preachers" who were not ordained (and therefore could not offer the sacraments) for Methodist society meetings and evangelical preaching--which meant that, by the Wesleys' intentional design, the Methodists had to rely on the Church of England for the sacraments. Furthermore, Methodist society meetings were not to be scheduled at times that would conflict with services in the local Church of England parish. Thus, during the Wesleys' lifetimes, the Methodists were not a "church" because they had no ordained ministers of their own. Unlike the Dissenters and Independent churches that flourished in England as protesters against the established Church of England, both John and Charles Wesley were committed to the Church of England and understood their movement to be thoroughly Anglican--even if their intentions of keeping the Methodist movement within the ecclesiastical boundaries of the Church of England were eventually ignored after their deaths. The Wesleys' emphasis on the interior spiritual life--especially the doctrine of Christian perfection--was influenced by previous Anglican writers, including William Law and Jeremy Taylor.
Theologically, the Articles of Faith of the Church of the Nazarene are based very closely on the Methodists' Articles of Religion, which are in turn an abridgement (by John Wesley himself) of the Church of England's Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion. Many of the key theological terms and turns of phrases in our Articles of Faith can be traced back to the Church of England's Thirty-Nine Articles. Some congregations in the Church of the Nazarene base their worship services on the liturgy in the Book of Common Prayer, and a few congregations actually use the Book of Common Prayer in worship. Many of the rites contained in The Church Rituals Handbook (put together in 1997 by Jesse Middendorf, published by Nazarene Publishing House) are adapted from the Book of Common Prayer. Although our Article of Faith on entire sanctification has no parallel in the Thirty-Nine Articles, the Wesleys' understanding of Christian perfection (as noted previously) was deeply influenced by Anglican writers William Law (particularly his books A Practical Treatise Upon Christian Perfection and A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life) and Jeremy Taylor (whose books The Rule and Exercises of Holy Living and The Rule and Exercises of Holy Dying were especially influential). The deep catholicity expressed in the opening paragraph of the Manual's "Historical Statement" likewise reflects the Church of the Nazarene's deep Anglican roots.
Given both our historical roots and our theological roots, the Wesleyan tradition is unquestionably Anglican.
From where Anglicans stand in the "middle way" between Roman Catholics and Protestants, there are "extremes" on both sides that Anglicans wish to avoid. On the Roman Catholic side, for example, we reject the insistence that the Bishop of Rome--the pope--has primacy as the spiritual leader of all of God's Church, and we reject the doctrine that papal teachings ex cathedra are infallible. On the Protestant side, we are best off avoiding the overemphasis on sola scriptura, which dismisses the role of the "tradition of the Church" and, when taken to its ultimate conclusion, seems inevitably to lead to fundamentalistic approaches to Scripture. This, it seems to me, is the fatal flaw of Protestantism.
On the positive side, we have been enriched by both Roman Catholics and Protestants. From the Roman Catholics we get our deep respect for the tradition of the Church (as enunciated in the opening paragraph of the Manual's "Historical Statement"), a high view of the role of sacraments, and an appreciation for our general superintendents as "bishops" in the Church--and not merely political leaders who campaign for election (as is the case in many Protestant denominations). From the Protestants we gain our strong emphasis on the importance of the "new birth" as well as the vital spirituality that the Pietists encouraged.
"It is time the Church of Jesus Christ overcame the disjunctions created by the 16th-century Reformation. What is called for is the 'evangelical catholicism' of John Wesley's 'middle way' in which the two historic Christian traditions were synthesized. In this synthesis the English Reformer not only recovered for the Church a viable doctrine of holiness but also pointed the way to a scriptural view and practice of the sacraments that is both apostolic and catholic." --William M. Greathouse, former General Superintendent, Church of the Nazarene, in "Foreword" to Rob L. Staples, Outward Sign and Inward Grace: The Place of Sacraments in Wesleyan Spirituality.
***
I think that Tom did a great job expressing this position!
A couple of additional considerations came up in our subsequent conversation. - First, Tom pointed out that the Manual for the Church of the Nazarene nowhere identifies us as Protestants. In fact, that term was replaced by the term Christian in 2005 (where it was situated in a section in the Appendix). - Nevertheless, it seems that those who handle the denominational website (and perhaps, too, I think in the "Nazarene Essentials" and "One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism" editions of Holiness Today) do identify us as Protestant. Of course, it must be pointed out that the two HT volumes are expected to make changes over time. Perhaps, especially as the latter volume changes when the new Manual comes out, it could make this change in wording (if, indeed, it is actually referenced in that volume!). It should also be pointed out that neither the website, nor HT carry the authority of the Manual.
Second, Tom points out that the "Historical Statement" in the Manual starts with the early church and catholicity, and then immediately moves in the second paragraph to the Wesleys and Methodism--without even giving a tip of the hat to the Protestant reformers.
Third, I would like to see the fact that Wesley, himself, in his context, identifies himself (and Anglicanism) as Protestant over against the Church of Rome. I believe that this could be addressed, but I have not seen it specifically taken up.
Fourth, I pointed out that the World Methodist Council, of which the Church of the Nazarene is a member denomination, uses the terminology of "evangelical, catholic and reformed," which points to the Anglican via media.
Finally, I want to express my thanks to Rev'd. Miles for graciously agreeing to allow me to post his comments on my blog!
Friday, May 24, 2024
Aldersgate Day!
Today, we in the Wesleyan tradition celebrate Aldersgate Day. If you don't know what Aldersgate Day is, I invite you to take a look at my video, below. (For a more in-depth look at the meaning of John Wesley's Aldersgate experience, take a look at this video with Mark Olson)
Saturday, May 18, 2024
Pentecost Sunday
Tomorrow, the Church around the world will celebrate the culmination of the Great Fifty Days, the conclusion of the Easter season, the outpouring of the promise of the Father, the baptism with the Holy Spirit, and the birth of the Church. - John the Baptizer had declared concerning Jesus, "I baptize you with water; but one who is more powerful than I is coming; I am not worthy to untie the thong of his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire" (Luke 3:16, NRSV). Jesus assured the disciples that it would be to their advantage that He would ascend to the Father, because, in doing so, He would send the Holy Spirit (the Advocate/Comforter/Counselor/Helper - parakletos ) to them (John 16:7). The Holy Spirit would teach them everything and remind them of all that Jesus had said to them (14:26), and the Holy Spirit would "prove the world wrong about sin and righteousness and judgement (16:8).
This holds special meanings for our family, because my daughter, Sarah, was baptized on Pentecost Sunday 29 years ago (which is interesting, because she is currently only 28 years old!), and my son, Matthew, was baptized on Pentecost Sunday 25 years ago, when our district superintendent, the Rev'd. Dr. M. V. Scutt, came to our church in Greencastle (IN) on both occasions to baptize our newborn children.
Wednesday, May 15, 2024
Wesley Wednesday: John Wesley on Worship
This is the final week for the course on Worship that I am teaching for Wesley Seminary (at Indiana Wesleyan University). - There are two quotes from John Wesley that I shared with my students, this week. They are important quotes for the topic of worship. The worship of God, or course, is serious business. It cannot be done casually or according to our whims. And this is what Wesley is getting at in the following quotes.
I do not mean, "Embrace my modes of worship," or, "I will embrace yours." This also is a thing which does not depend either on your choice or mine. We must both act as each is fully persuaded in his own mind. Hold you fast that which you believe is most acceptable to God, and I will do the same. (Works Bicentennial 2:89-90)
But the man of a truly catholic spirit, having weighed all things in the balance of the sanctuary, has no doubt, no scruple at all concerning that particular mode of worship wherein he joins. He is clearly convinced that this manner of worshipping God is both scriptural and rational. He knows none in the world which is more scriptural, none which is more rational. Therefore without rambling hither and thither he cleaves close thereto, and praises God for the opportunity of so doing. (Works Bicentennial 2:93)
Of course, John Wesley was convinced that the Book of Common Prayer provided the best form of worship. In his preface to his conservative revision of the BCP for the Methodists in North America, Wesley wrote the following:
I believe there is no liturgy in the world, either in ancient or modern language, which breathes more of a solid, scriptural, rational Piety, than the Common Prayer of the Church of England.
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Wesley Wednesday: Charles Wesley on Baptismal Regeneration
Yesterday, for Morning Prayer, I sang the last of the hymns in Ken Bible's Wesley Hymns. The very last hymn is a short, two verse hymn that presents a prayer for the sacrament of Holy Baptism. In it, Charles Wesley presents a very different understanding of Baptism than is so often presented in modern Evangelical circles. In such circles (often times, including many within my own denomination), Baptism is seen as simply a testimony given by the one being baptized about their decision to accept Jesus. Perhaps it is also a testimony of what such faith in Jesus has previously done for them. However, Charles Wesley understands Baptism as a true sacrament. He understands it as a means of God's grace, and he makes that clear in this prayerful hymn.
In solemn pow'r come down!
Wednesday, April 10, 2024
Wesley Wednesday: A Charles & John Combination
As I was singing my way through "Wesley Hymns" (Lillenas Publishing), I came upon the following hymn from Charles Wesley, as well as the quote by John. They provide an important reminded that we keep our priorities in their proper order.
Friday, March 1, 2024
The 2024 Annual Report of the Board of General Superintendents
The 100th session of the General Board of the Church of the Nazarene recently concluded their annual meeting in Overland Park, Kansas. During the meeting the Rev'd. Dr. Fili Chambo, General Superintendent, delivered the annual report on behalf of the Board of General Superintendents. Bishop Chambo's report can be viewed, here.
Wednesday, January 31, 2024
Wesley Wednesday: A Timely Word
This then is real, genuine, solid virtue. Not truth alone, nor conformity to truth. This is a property of real virtue, not the essence of it. Not love alone, though this comes nearer the mark; for 'love' in one sense 'is the fulfilling of the law'. No: truth and love united together are the essence of virtue or holiness.
Wednesday, January 24, 2024
Wesley Wednesday: From Sermon 9
Today, my Facebook feed drew my attention back to two posts I made one year ago. Both of the posts came from John Wesley's Sermon 9: "The Spirit of Bondage and of Adoption." These two quotes will
serve as today's Wesley Wednesday quotes:
And, of the "natural man" who is in a state of spiritual sleep, John Wesley says:
Why is it that he is in no dread of God? Because he is totally ignorant of him: . . . saying, "God is merciful;" confounding and swallowing up at once in that unwieldy idea of mercy all his holiness and essential hatred of sin, all his justice, wisdom, and truth. . . . Or he fancies . . . that Christ came to . . . save his people IN, not FROM their sins, to bring them to heaven without holiness . . .