Wesleyan/Anglican
Thoughts from a pastor who understands himself to be classically Wesleyan in theology and who embraces a Wesleyan/Anglican view of liturgy and the sacraments.
Saturday, November 14, 2026
Monday, October 26, 2026
General Assembly Resolution: Membership / Baptism
Article
II. Local Churches
23. The membership of a local church shall consist of all who have been
organized as a church by those authorized so to do and who have been publicly
received by those having proper authority, after having experience Christian
baptism, and having declared their experience of salvation, their belief in
our doctrines, and their willingness to submit to our government. (100-109)
B.
Local Church Membership
109. Full Membership.
The full membership of the local church shall be composed of all persons who
have been organized into a local church by those authorized so to do, and all
who have been publicly received by the pastor, the district superintendent, or
the general superintendent, after having experienced Christian baptism, and
having declared their experience of salvation, their belief in the doctrines
of the Church of the Nazarene, and their willingness to submit to its
government. The local church leadership shall seek to place every member into a
ministry of service and a circle of care and support. (23, 109.2, 113, 115.1,
125.1, 129, 524.8, 530.8-530.9)
704.
RECEPTION OF CHURCH MEMBERS
It is expected that prospective
members have been baptized and have professed the Christian faith and
been instructed in the doctrine and practices of the Church of the Nazarene.
They may come forward to stand before the congregation and the pastor shall
address them as follows: . . .
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. It is generally accepted that,
as the late General Superintendent Emeritus, the Rev’d. Dr. William Greathouse,
has said, “In the New Testament church there simply were no unbaptized
Christians . . .” (Staples 11) Staples, Rob L. Outward Sing and Inward
Grace: The Place of Sacraments in Wesleyan Spirituality. Kansas City:
Beacon Hill P 1991.
2. The Church, generally, for over 2000 years has understood baptism as the sign of initiation into the new covenant and the community of faith, the Church.
3. Jesus and the apostles command baptism (e.g., Matt. 28:19; Acts 2:38; 10:48).
4. The Scriptures consistently declare the importance of baptism (e.g., John 3:5; Rom. 6:3; 1 Cor. 12:13; 1 Peter 3:21).
5. Article of Faith XII. Baptism, paragraph 12, indicates that Christian baptism is “commanded by our Lord,” that it “is a sacrament signifying acceptance of the benefits of the atonement and incorporation into the Body of Christ.” - Thus, those who refuse baptism are acting inconsistently with the membership requirements in paragraph 23, which states that they must declare “. . . their beliefs in our doctrines . . .”
6. The FIRST of our General Rules under V. The Covenant of Christian Character (par. 21 – 21.1) calls us to do “. . . that which is enjoined in the Word of God, which is our rule of both faith and practice . . .”
7. Most denominations, including the two denominations most like the Church of the Nazarene (viz., The Wesleyan Church and the Free Methodist Church of North America), along with the new Global Methodist Church, require baptism prior to membership. In fact, allowing members who are not baptized places us at odds with orthodox Christianity, itself.
8. It is surely more important for people to be fully “Christian” than just “Nazarene.”
General Assembly Resolution: General Superintendents Footnote
G.
The General Superintendents1
1(General Superintendent was
John Wesley’s term for the biblical episkopos. The Church of the
Nazarene has retained this terminology for those elders who fulfill the
episcopal office referred to as bishops in other Wesleyan/Methodist
denominations.)
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. When Phineas Bresee used the
term general superintendent, he understood that it was the Methodist
term for bishop. Both terms were used interchangeably to describe those
elders serving in this role in Bresee’s former denomination (viz., the
Methodist Episcopal Church). Further, general
superintendent was the terminology Wesley used for bishops Coke and Asbury.
2. This footnote would provide clarity when relating to and cooperating with
other denominations.
3. This footnote does not change our use of the term general superintendent. However, it does provide an important biblical grounding for our terminology, and clearly positions our ecclesiology within our Wesleyan tradition.
4. This footnote helps us to recognize that the term general superintendent has roots in the biblical and ecclesial world, rather than the corporate world.
5. This footnote may help to reinforce
the reality that the “general” in general superintendent is a
geographical term relating to the scope of the superintendency, rather than a
title of (military type) rank.
6. The footnote changes nothing at all concerning the stated duties and powers of the general superintendents, their elected tenure, or their elder’s orders.
General Assembly Resolution: Official Church Anthem
OFFICIAL
CHURCH ANTHEM
Resolution
Not in the Manual
Be it resolved that the
hymn, “Holiness unto the Lord” by Lelia N. Morris (as found on page 503 of Sing
to the Lord) be declared to be the official anthem of the Church of the
Nazarene.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. “Holiness unto the Lord” has already been acknowledged, elsewhere, as the “unofficial” anthem of the church.
2. The message of the hymn expresses clearly the identity of the Church of the Nazarene as a Wesleyan-holiness denomination.
3. The hymn is widely and consistently (if not always) sung during the ordination services at our various district assemblies.
4. Such a resolution does not require the use of the hymn in any particular setting, but simply reaffirms our holiness identity.
General Assembly Resolution: Universal Footnote
HISTORICAL
STATEMENT
The Church of the Nazarene confesses itself to be a branch of Christ’s “one,
holy, universal1, and apostolic” church, . . .
1 Universal is a clarification of the meaning of the traditional term catholic. Its usage is not intended to separate us from the traditional marks of the Church, but rather, to clearly identify with those traditional marks.
701. BAPTISM OF BELIEVERS &
702. BAPTISM OF INFANTS OR YOUNG CHILDREN
. . . “We
believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Church universal1 of
Jesus Christ, the communion of saints, . . .
1 Universal
is a clarification of the meaning of the traditional term catholic.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The footnotes seeks to clarify
that we firmly stand within Christ’s Church.
General Assembly Resolution: Sacramental Wine
29.3 We call our people to
abstain from drinking alcohol . . .
. . . Ephesians 5:18; Philippians
2:4)
(Only unfermented or dealcoholized wine should be used, along with bread, in
the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper.)
I.
SACRAMENTS
700.
LORD’S SUPPER
The administration of the Lord’s
Supper . . .
. . . NOTE: Only unfermented or
dealcoholized wine should be used, along with bread, in the
sacrament of the Lord’s Supper.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. This resolution seeks to
clarify our rational for using non-alcoholic wine for the sacrament by
reintroducing it back into our statement in The Covenant of Christian
Conduct. This grounding was lost when
the Covenant was re-written for the 2023 Manual.
General Assembly Resolution: Tongues
926. Evidence of Baptism with the Holy Spirit . . .
To affirm that even a special or any alleged physical evidence, or
“prayer language,” is evidence of the baptism with the Spirit is contrary to
the biblical and historic position of the Church. The biblical and historic
position of the Church of the Nazarene is that the true gift of tongues is a
missionary gift to clearly spread the gospel to those who speak in other human languages,
as is demonstrated in Acts 2, 10, and 19. We do not believe that speaking
in unknown tongues is the evidence of being filled with the Holy Spirit.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. This addition is reflective of
the consistent statements from the board of general superintendents throughout
the history of the denomination.
3. While clear statements have been made by the board of general
superintendents, it is time that the Manual include a clear statement
concerning the nature of the biblical gift of tongues. - This
addition provides such a statement.
General Assembly Resolution: Elder / Deacon
124.4. Administer the sacraments of the
Lord’s Supper and Baptism. The Lord’s Supper should be administered at least
once a quarter. Pastors are encouraged to move toward a more frequent celebration
of this means of grace. A district licensed minister who has not complied fully
with the provisions of paragraph 524.7 shall arrange for the administration of
the sacrament by an ordained elder minister. A local licensed
minister shall not be eligible to administer the sacraments of baptism or the
Lord’s Supper. Consideration should be given for extending the Lord’s Supper to
homebound persons, under supervision of the pastor. (523.7, 700)
504. The Church of the Nazarene recognizes the order of elder and
the order of deacon only one order of the preaching ministry, that of
elder. It also recognizes that the member of the clergy may serve the
church in various capacities (Ephesians 4:11-12). . . .
525.1. The deacon does not witness to a specific call to preach.
The church recognizes, on the basis of Scripture and experience, that God calls
some individuals to a lifetime ministry who do not witness to
such a specific call of Word and Service, and believes that
individuals so called to such ministries the ministry of a deacon should
be recognized and confirmed by the church and should meet requirements, and be
granted responsibilities, established by the church. This is a permanent order
of ministry.
525.2. The deacon must meet the requirements of the order for
education, exhibit the appropriate gifts and graces, and be recognized and
confirmed by the church. The deacon shall be vested with the
authority to administer the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s
Supper, to assist the elder in the distribution
of the Lord’s Supper, and to officiate at marriages
where the laws of the state do not prohibit, to conduct worship, and on
occasion to conduct worship and to preach. It is understood that the
Lord and the church may use this person’s gifts and graces in various associate
ministries. As a symbol of the servant ministry of the Body of Christ, the
deacon may also use his or her gifts in roles outside the institutional church.
(124.4, 124.9)
525.4. If in the pursuance of his or her ministry, the ordained deacon
feels called to the preaching ministry of elder, he or she may be
ordained elder as such upon completion of the requirements for
that credential and the return of the deacon credential.
526. An elder is a minister whose call of God to preach, gifts, and usefulness have been demonstrated and enhanced by proper training and experience, and who has been separated for the ministry of Word and Table and to the service of Christ through His church by the vote of a district assembly and by the solemn act of ordination, and thus has been fully invested to perform all functions of the Christian ministry.
526.1. We recognize but one order of preaching ministry—that of
elder. This The order of elder is a permanent order in the church.
The elder is to lead well in the church, to preach the Word, to administer the
sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, and to solemnize matrimony, all in
the name of, and in subjection to, Jesus Christ, the great Head of the Church.
(31, 124.2, 124.4, 124.9)
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. Throughout the history of the Church, from
ancient times up to and including our own lineage of John Wesley’s Anglicanism
and American Methodism, the distinction between the order of deacon and the
order of elder has been: a.) the deacon is called to a ministry focused on
service, and b.) the elder is vested with the authority to administer the
sacrament of the Lord’s Supper. This has
been expressed as the ministry of “Word and Service,” on the one hand, and the
ministry of “Word and Table,” on the other hand.
2. This is this distinction that holds nearly universally in the larger Wesleyan/Methodist tradition.
3. This is the main distinction that seems to be held ecumenically, and is stated as such in the reports of the ecumenical dialogues between the World Methodist Council (of which the Church of the Nazarene has been a member) and the Anglican Communion, and it is the main distinction that seems to be held in the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions, as well.
4. Our current distinction between the two orders (viz., preaching), seems to have been assumed due to the statement in par. 526.1 that “We recognize but one order of preaching ministry – that of elder.” - However, making preaching the distinction between the two orders when we developed the order of deacon was an erroneous assumption. The statement found in par. 526.1 was not intended to distinguish the order of elder from any other order. Rather, that statement was meant to reinforce that we had only ONE order; that of elder. We did not have TWO preaching orders (viz., elder and deacon), as did the Methodist Episcopal Church of the time. We only had ONE preaching order (viz., elder).
5. To identify the distinction between the elder and deacon as one of a call to preach, not only disregards the historic position of the larger Christian Church universal, but is very difficult to maintain when the deacon, according to par. 525.2, may also preach, and when we are a part of a tradition that involves lay preachers (cf. par. 503.1).
6. The proposed changes will bring us much closer to alignment with the usage of the terms in Scripture, the distinctions throughout the history of the Christian Church, the ecumenical consensus, and our own Wesleyan heritage.
General Assembly Resolution: Women in Ministry
501.
Theology of Women in Ministry. The Church of the Nazarene supports the
right of women to use using their God-given spiritual gifts
within the church and affirms the historic right practice of electing
and appointing of women to
be elected and appointed to places of leadership within the Church of the
Nazarene, including the offices orders
of both elder and deacon. . . .
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The language of rights is foreign to
Scripture, but arises out political language, particularly in the Western
world.
2. No one, whether a woman or a man, has
“a right” to be ordained. Rather, we
affirm that God calls certain women and men to the ordained ministry. We seek to ordain only those women and men
who profess a call from God.
General Assembly Resolution: General Superintendency / Ordination
307.4. Have discretionary power to ordain, or appoint others elders (preferably another general
superintendent, general superintendent emeriti or retired) to ordain, those who have been properly elected to be elders or deacons.
(314.1, 320, 530.5-530.6)
ministers elders with appropriate religious
exercises, under the direction of the presiding general superintendent. (307.4)
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
This is also why
it has historically been the presbytery (i.e., elders, rather than deacons) who
have joined the bishop (i.e., the elder serving in the office of general
superintendent) in the laying on of hands.
6. As the paragraph currently reads, it would be possible (even if unlikely) that a general superintendent could appoint someone outside of holy orders to ordain. Such would be completely and wholly inconsistent with the historic Christian and Wesleyan and Nazarene understanding of ordination.
Friday, September 25, 2026
THE LITANY: SEPTEMBER 25, 2026
Here is a recorded service of The Litany for Friday, September 25, 2026, for Ancient Paths Church of the Nazarene.
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
WESLEY WEDNESDAY: John Wesley's Understanding of "Real Presence" in the Lord's Supper
Borgen’s book, by the way, was used as the primary model for Rob Staples’ Outward Sign and Inward Grace: The Place of Sacraments in Wesleyan Spirituality. Dr. Staples was my professor of Sacramental Theology at Nazarene Theological Seminary. His book is the first of its kind to originate from the Holiness wing of Methodism. So, if you are a part of one of the Holiness denominations (e.g., Nazarene, Free Methodist, Wesleyan), I recommend Staple's book, first, followed by Borgen for a more in-depth study. The following quotes identify Wesley’s understanding of Christ’s Real Presence in the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper.
The first quote is an excerpt of a letter from John’s mother, Susannah, in response to John’s description of Christ’s presence as understood by one of his friends. Susannah writes:
I own I never understood by the ‘real presence,’ more than what he has elegantly expressed,
that ‘the divine nature of Christ is then eminently present, to impart, by the operation of his
Holy Spirit, the benefits of his death to worthy receivers.’ And surely the divine presence of
our Lord, thus applying the virtue and merits of the great atonement to each true believer,
makes the consecrated bread more than a sign of Christ’s body; since by his so doing, we
receive not only the sign, but with it the thing signified, all the benefits of his incarnation
and passion!1
John
responds to his mother by saying:
One
consideration is enough to make me assent to his and your judgement concerning
the
Holy Sacrament; which is, that we cannot allow Christ’s human nature to be
present in it,
without allowing either con- or transubstantiation. But that His divinity is so united to us
then, as He never is but to worthy receivers, I firmly believe, though the manner
of that
union is utterly a mystery to me.2
Borgen, himself, asserts:
Wesley rejects the Lutheran views of consubstantiation and ubiquity, which
require a
communicating of the properties of the divine nature to the human.
Christ is only
omnipresent according to his divine nature; therefore, in order
to communicate the benefits
of his human life and death to us, these must be,
as it were, at the disposal of Christ as
omnipresent God. According to Wesley,
no corporeal, carnal, material, substantial or
localized presence of Christ in
the sacrament can be accepted.”3
Borgen summarizes Wesley’s view by saying:
Wesley’s conception of the “Real Presence” excludes all ideas of corporeal,
physical-
material, substantial or localized presence, tied to or subsumed under
the visible elements.
In fact, although he would insist upon a close
relationship between the res and the signum,
he shies away from
any view of a static presence, connected organically, although spiritually
with
the elements after consecration. This would impose a form of necessity upon
God, as
well as lead to the dangers of con- or transubstantiation. Instead,
Wesley holds a view of the
“Real Presence,” which may properly be called “Dynamic”
or “Living Presence”: where
God acts, there he is. The “objective presence”
cannot be thought of as the static presence of
an object, but rather as that of
a living and acting person working through the means.4
Borgen quotes one of the Wesley Hymns to illuminate John’s views:
The Cup of
Blessing, blest by Thee,
Let it thy Blood impart;
The Bread thy Mystic Body be,
And chear each languid Heart.5
Thus, “As the cup conveys or imparts the Blood; so the bread conveys or imparts
the ‘mystic
Body’; and both the bread and the cup . . . are said to be what
they convey.6
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. Borgen,
p 63.
2. p 63.
3. p 65
4. p 68-69
5. p 69
6. p 69










